REFERENCE · RECOVERY TECHNIQUE
Looking for a Warning Only If There Is One
When this may help: When a repeatable change genuinely comes before an attack, agree one safe response; if there is no warning, use planning that does not depend on it. [Specialist guidance and emerging model; preventive effect uncertain]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For the Person With FND
What counts as a warning?
A warning is a change you can recognize before the fall with enough time to do something useful. Some people describe a brief feeling of disconnection or a change in movement. Others have no warning at all, even when they and their clinicians look carefully. Not finding one is not a failure of awareness or effort. [1][2]
Disconnection, sometimes called dissociation, can mean feeling detached, unreal or less connected with the surroundings. It is one possible experience, not a required feature of every drop attack. A sensation noticed only after impact is not automatically a warning. [2][3]
Look briefly and without pressure
If you want to explore this, tell the clinician what you already notice. A supporter may have observed a consistent change, but their observation needs checking against your experience and the timing of the event. “No warning” and “not sure” are valid answers.
A short note after selected events may help distinguish what happened before, during and afterwards. There is no need to scan your body all day or provoke an attack to test a theory. If monitoring makes daily life harder without producing useful information, discuss stopping or simplifying it. [3][4]
Agree one action if a reliable warning exists
The clinician can help decide whether there is enough time to stop the task, sit in a nearby suitable seat or use a stable support. The response must fit the location and your movement ability. Do not rush across a room to reach a chair or assume a handhold will prevent a collapse. An action that comes too late is not your fault. [2]
For example, someone who consistently notices a few seconds of detachment while already beside an assessed seat may agree to sit and pause. This is an illustration of a conditional plan, not evidence that everyone can interrupt attacks.
Practise the arrangement only in a safe setting with the team’s guidance. Success means using a workable response when possible; the approach has not been proved to prevent every fall.
If there is no usable warning
Put effort into the environment, mobility support and injury response. You still have useful care options. A changed symptom such as new faintness or palpitations should be assessed rather than automatically labelled the warning you were looking for. [2][5]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
Ask permission before sharing observations. Be specific about timing rather than saying, “You must have known it was coming.” Avoid repeatedly prompting the person to check for a sensation.
If an agreed warning occurs, offer the agreed response calmly. If an attack occurs anyway, help with safety and recovery; do not turn the event into evidence that the person ignored advice.
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Separate prodrome, trigger, peri-event experience and retrospective interpretation. Establish whether a cue is sufficiently reliable and early to support an actionable plan, including where the action is physically safe. [1][3]
The cognitive-behavioural model is a formulation hypothesis from qualitative data, not a universal mechanism. Do not assign an undiscovered prodrome by default or overlook orthostatic, cardiac or other symptoms because a warning-based plan is being considered. [2][3][5]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
Research and Sources
The warning strategy comes from specialist guidance and exploratory research, not a controlled prevention trial. Absence of a warning is compatible with the described clinical presentation. Individual examples are planning illustrations, not accounts of demonstrated treatment success. [1][2][3]
Evidence reviewed: September 24, 2026. Examples are educational illustrations, not patient quotations or tested protocols.
| Citation | Full citation and stable record | Support and limits | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoeritzauer I, Carson AJ, Stone J. “Cryptogenic drop attacks” revisited: evidence of overlap with functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2018;89(7):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317396 FND-CIT-0059 | Retrospective drop-attack cohort; clinical overlap and naturalistic outcomes cannot establish treatment efficacy or diagnose every unexplained fall. | — |
| 2 | Stone J. Functional drop attacks. Neurosymptoms.org. Accessed September 24, 2026. https://neurosymptoms.org/en/symptoms/fnd-symptoms/functional-drop-attacks/ FND-CIT-0061 | Specialist education and practical ideas; not controlled treatment evidence. Typical descriptions must not be used to rule out serious injury. | — |
| 3 | Revell ER, Gillespie D, Morris PG, Stone J. Drop attacks as a subtype of FND: a cognitive behavioural model using grounded theory. Epilepsy & Behavior Reports. 2021;16:100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100491 FND-CIT-0060 | Qualitative interview-and-diary study of seven people; a proposed cognitive-behavioural model, not proof of a cause or treatment benefit. | — |
| 4 | Nicholson C, Edwards MJ, Carson AJ, et al. Occupational therapy consensus recommendations for functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2020;91(10):1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322281 FND-CIT-0011 | FND occupational therapy consensus: activity and access planning; not direct evidence that equipment or an individual adaptation prevents drop attacks. | — |
| 5 | Bennett K, Diamond C, Hoeritzauer I, Gardiner P, McWhirter L, Carson A, Stone J. A practical review of functional neurological disorder (FND) for the general physician. Clinical Medicine. 2021;21(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0987 FND-CIT-0001 | Practical clinical review: positive diagnosis and coexisting conditions, not a drop-attack treatment trial. | — |
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—