REFERENCE · RECOVERY TECHNIQUE
Choosing Support for Getting Around
When this may help: When walking or standing leaves you vulnerable to sudden falls, choose assessed aids, seating, assistance and routes that support daily access. [Individualized clinical and access guidance; no aid guarantees prevention]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For the Person With FND
What a mobility strategy includes
A mobility strategy is the practical way you get from one place to another. It may include a walking aid, wheelchair, planned seats, a companion, different transport or a shorter route. Its purpose is to make an activity possible with appropriate support, not to label your symptoms as permanent. [1]
No single aid can be assumed to prevent a sudden drop attack. A walker may help one aspect of gait but not keep someone upright during an abrupt collapse. A companion is not a fall-catching device. The choice needs to fit how your events actually happen. [1][2]
Ask for an assessment in the setting that matters
Tell the therapist where the problem occurs and what you need to reach. Include no-warning attacks, leg weakness, dizziness, pain, fatigue, injuries and whether you can use the device’s grips or brakes reliably. If you need a chair, transfers into and out of it matter as much as the journey. [1][3]
Ask for a clear answer to three questions: What does this support help with? What risk remains? What do we do if an attack occurs while using it? A plan that depends on a helper who is rarely available needs another option.
Make the plan practical
An outing might combine supported mobility, an accessible entrance, a place to sit and a route to a suitable bathroom. Choosing wheelchair access for part of a journey can be compatible with separately agreed walking practice. The amount of walking is not the only measure of whether the outing went well. This is an example of planning, not a prescription for a particular aid. [1]
Ask for fitting, instruction and review. Comfort, skin contact, shoulder or wrist strain, fatigue, maintenance and transport all affect whether equipment is usable. If a device adds pain or creates another hazard, seek review rather than assuming discomfort is necessary rehabilitation. [1][3]
Support remains available while treatment is tried
If the team proposes less assistance, agree how to trial the change safely and how to restore support if needed. Required equipment should not be hidden or abruptly removed to see whether an attack occurs. Longer-term use can be appropriate when disability persists. [1][3]
During a flare, choose the supported option that fits that day. After a fall, use the injury plan, not the presence of an aid as reassurance that you cannot be hurt. [4]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
Learn the agreed assistance and transfer method. Walking beside someone does not mean you can safely catch their full weight. Do not grab or lift in ways you have not been trained to use.
Help check routes, seating and equipment when asked. Support the person’s decisions about participation instead of treating an aid-free outing as the only success.
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Assess the interaction between event mechanics and the device: abrupt loss of support, upper-limb control, braking, seating, transfers and environmental demands. Consider separate gait or weakness rehabilitation when indicated; improvement there may not remove drop attacks. [1][3][5]
Older FND consensus favours minimizing unnecessary aids, especially during acute retraining, while allowing equipment for ongoing disability. Apply that advice through individualized review, not withholding safe access or requiring rehabilitation failure before providing necessary support. No equipment strategy has established efficacy for abolishing functional drop attacks. [1][3]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
Research and Sources
These recommendations concern assessment, safe access and participation. The cited consensus covers FND more broadly. The particular support arrangement is a clinical decision, not a validated drop-attack treatment or a diagnostic test. [1][2][3]
Evidence reviewed: September 24, 2026. Examples are educational illustrations, not patient quotations or tested protocols.
| Citation | Full citation and stable record | Support and limits | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nicholson C, Edwards MJ, Carson AJ, et al. Occupational therapy consensus recommendations for functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2020;91(10):1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322281 FND-CIT-0011 | FND occupational therapy consensus: activity and access planning; not direct evidence that equipment or an individual adaptation prevents drop attacks. | — |
| 2 | Stone J. Functional drop attacks. Neurosymptoms.org. Accessed September 24, 2026. https://neurosymptoms.org/en/symptoms/fnd-symptoms/functional-drop-attacks/ FND-CIT-0061 | Specialist education and practical ideas; not controlled treatment evidence. Typical descriptions must not be used to rule out serious injury. | — |
| 3 | Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2015;86(10):1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309255 FND-CIT-0028 | Broader functional motor physiotherapy consensus; individualized rehabilitation, not a validated drop-attack protocol. | — |
| 4 | NHS. Falls. Reviewed March 6, 2025; accessed September 24, 2026. Source. FND-CIT-0216 | General falls safety and care guidance; not an FND trial. Transfer and activity advice needs adaptation to the person and any injury. | — |
| 5 | Hoeritzauer I, Carson AJ, Stone J. “Cryptogenic drop attacks” revisited: evidence of overlap with functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2018;89(7):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317396 FND-CIT-0059 | Retrospective drop-attack cohort; clinical overlap and naturalistic outcomes cannot establish treatment efficacy or diagnose every unexplained fall. | — |
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—