REFERENCE · RECOVERY TECHNIQUE
Making a Plan for Familiar Paralysis Episodes
When this may help: When assessed limb immobility comes in episodes, agree safe positioning, communication, optional movement cues and a route back to the interrupted activity. [Individualized clinical planning; an episode-stopping effect is unproven]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For the Person With FND
What a familiar-episode plan is for
Some people have persistent paralysis; others have episodes when movement becomes unavailable, sometimes on top of baseline weakness. A plan is a short agreement about what you and others will do during an already assessed pattern. It cannot establish the cause of a new episode or guarantee when movement will return. [1][2]
If immobility happens only within a functional seizure, use the functional-seizure plan instead. Once awareness and control return, any persisting limb problem can be considered separately. A person who cannot move or speak may still be aware; ask the team how best to communicate without repeatedly testing them.
Agree the plan before it is needed
- Get safe. Name the supported position or aid to use and who can help. If movement stops during a transfer, helpers need a trained contingency plan rather than an improvised lift. Do not try unsupported standing to find out whether the episode has ended.
- Make communication possible. Agree how to offer choices or signal a need if a reliable response remains available. If no response is possible, explain calmly what you are doing and follow the agreed assessment and safety plan.
- Keep essentials available. Include warmth or comfort, access to a call device, toileting help and positioning. A long episode may require the same skin and pressure care as persistent immobility. [3][4]
- Offer one familiar movement starting point, if wanted. A therapist may have identified an action that sometimes helps movement become available. Try only the assessed version with its required support. It is optional; repeated commands are not necessary if it is inaccessible. [2]
- Return by the safe route. Resuming the interrupted task may require assistance, equipment or a smaller step. Do not assume that one movement means all balance or limb control has returned. Review the episode if its duration, consequences or pattern differed substantially. [2][3]
These steps are an organizational aid, not a validated treatment sequence. Your clinician should adapt them to your diagnosed events and setting.
A short example
An agreed card might say: “Keep me safely supported. Tell me what is happening. Offer my usual cue once if I can engage. If it does not help, continue practical care. Use the listed emergency changes and contact plan.” Add your actual positioning, communication and clinical instructions with the team; this example is not an emergency-care substitute.
When the familiar plan is not enough
New sudden weakness, facial droop or speech difficulty needs emergency assessment even if symptoms improve. New bladder or bowel dysfunction or numbness around the groin/buttocks with paralysis needs urgent spinal assessment. Injury, breathing difficulty, altered consciousness or a substantial change from the diagnosed pattern also requires prompt appropriate help. Do not delay assessment while trying to prove that an episode is functional. [1][5][6]
If episodes are becoming more disruptive without emergency features, ask for a planned review. You do not need to wait for an injury or complete loss of independence.
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
Use the agreed plan and a calm, ordinary voice. Ask before touch when possible, preserve privacy and keep the number of instructions small. Never use pain, startling or forced limb movement to check whether symptoms are real.
Follow only the transfer assistance you have been trained to provide. If the situation exceeds that training, get help. If the person cannot safely swallow or has impaired awareness, do not offer food, drink or oral medicine; use their clinical event plan. Support is still useful when no recovery cue is accessible.
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Describe the event phenotype, awareness, communication, expected variability and recovery pattern. Distinguish seizure-confined immobility from independently episodic motor loss. Avoid an arbitrary waiting period before emergency help when a new focal deficit or spinal warning is present. [1][5][6]
Agree manual-handling contingencies, pressure care for prolonged events, individualized cues and criteria for resuming transfers or mobility. There is no validated single motor cue that reliably terminates functional paralysis; the proposed sequence combines clinical planning and safety adaptations. [2][3][4]
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—
Research and Sources
This expands the original episode-planning entry, previously labelled emerging/consensus. It is not presented as an episode-stopping protocol. The emergency and pressure-care sources answer safety questions rather than demonstrating FND treatment efficacy. [1][2][4][5][6]
Evidence reviewed: September 23, 2026. Practical scenarios are illustrative, not patient quotations or tested protocols.
| Citation | Full citation and stable record | Support and limits | Figure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennett K, Diamond C, Hoeritzauer I, Gardiner P, McWhirter L, Carson A, Stone J. A practical review of functional neurological disorder (FND) for the general physician. Clinical Medicine. 2021;21(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0987 FND-CIT-0001 | Practical clinical review: positive diagnosis and coexisting conditions; not a trial of this technique. | — |
| 2 | Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2015;86(10):1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309255 FND-CIT-0028 | Functional motor physiotherapy consensus, including weakness/paralysis; recommendations and examples are not proof of isolated treatment efficacy. | — |
| 3 | Nicholson C, Edwards MJ, Carson AJ, et al. Occupational therapy consensus recommendations for functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2020;91(10):1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322281 FND-CIT-0011 | FND occupational therapy consensus: activity, adaptations and coordinated support; component efficacy has not been established. | — |
| 4 | National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pressure ulcers: prevention and management. CG179. Recommendations. Accessed September 23, 2026. FND-CIT-0214 | General pressure-injury prevention guidance for people at risk; supports assessment, repositioning and pressure redistribution, not recovery of functional movement. | — |
| 5 | Hoeritzauer I, Pronin S, Carson A, Statham P, Demetriades AK, Stone J. The clinical features and outcome of scan-negative and scan-positive cases in suspected cauda equina syndrome: a retrospective study of 276 patients. Journal of Neurology. 2018;265(12):2916–2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9078-2 FND-CIT-0016 | Cohort of suspected cauda equina syndrome; supports diagnostic distinctions, not a home rule for excluding spinal emergencies. | — |
| 6 | NHS. Symptoms of a stroke. Reviewed September 12, 2024; accessed September 17, 2026. Source. FND-CIT-0108 | General stroke emergency guidance; an FND diagnosis does not exclude a new stroke. | — |
For the Person With FND
For Family, Friends, and Other Supporters
For Clinicians and the Care Team
Research and Sources
—